Much promise, many miles to travel - my thoughts on the Government 2.0 Taskforce draft report | acidlabs
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-2160,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,footer_responsive_adv,qode-theme-ver-11.0,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.2,vc_responsive

Much promise, many miles to travel – my thoughts on the Government 2.0 Taskforce draft report

Much promise, many miles to travel – my thoughts on the Government 2.0 Taskforce draft report

The release earlier this week of the draft report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce has the potential to be a watershed moment in the management and delivery of government and its services to the people of Australia.

I find it more than a little interesting that after not much more than passing interest in the Taskforce’s work from anything except the Australian technology media, the mainstream media has now picked up the story and seems fascinated. It’s also more than a touch humorous that the report from Australia’s leading financial newspaper, the Australian Financial Review, had to be copy-pasted into a post at the Taskforce blog because of the AFR’s ridiculous and reader-unfriendly paywall.

Others, both in the public sector and external to it have voiced the view that the report is well written, addresses all the right issues and suggests a number of well-considered approaches to the problems of reforming government and the work it does. I couldn’t agree more. While there are the odd overly bureaucratic turn of phrase or suggestion in the report, they are forgiveable. This is after all, a report for government about government business – it must speak to its target in language it understands and is comfortable with. How else can encouragement of needed change occur if not in the language of those you seek to change?

I’ve engaged several times with members of the Taskforce and at event they’ve run as a part of their work. I’ve been more than impressed overall with the way the majority of the members have gone about their business and particularly in the way they have sought to walk the talk on the types of practices, behaviors and business they are working on.

But as of December 31, everything changes. The Taskforce disappears and in some way, shape or form, the work of the Taskforce becomes business as usual in some part of the byzantine machine that is the federal government. All that enthusiasm, interest, and modeling of the way things could and should be potentially goes dead in the water on 1 January.

I think this is an incredible risk. If the momentum that has been created becomes a part of some busy (albeit probably enthusiastic) bureaucrat’s work, handed to them to manage in addition to the mountain of work they already have, what happens? Does the work continue? Who remains to prod and poke, generating action, when people like Nicholas Gruen, who has been an outspoken agitator throughout the lifetime of the Taskforce, are no longer there?

Without a determined agitator and without rapid and decisive action on the part of the government, any outcomes from the Taskforce’s report risk being implemented by committee in some yet to be determined time frame. We risk ending up with a camel rather than the sleek, agile quarterhorse we have should the report be actioned in the way it recommends.

Should that happen, the greatest risk becomes inaction and apathy. If that occurs it will be a terrible waste and a great shame. I hope it is very much not the case.

What remains to be seen, and will undoubtedly be the most complex hurdle for all of this will be the hobby horse I’ve been riding throughout this journey – cultural change. Without a willingness to and action on cultural change in the public sector and at the legislative level, many of the recommendations will come to naught. Without explicit and powerful support from above (all the way to the Prime Minister) and all through APS management from Secretaries and agency heads down to EL1s (and equivalent), and the necessary support and education throughout the ranks, change will be terribly hard.

Even with the changes to the APSC guidance on public servant involvement online, FOI reform, and the dropping of control and filtering I am beginning to hear about, all of these things and the recommendations of the Taskforce will be incredibly hard to make happen without the cultural change, support and education that will lead to good execution of the recommendations and the attendant policy and practice reform.

I believe the willingness and capacity to make this all happen in the best possible way is there, I just hope that it all doesn’t get swallowed up by bureaucracy and people so busy they can’t make things happen. Making sure this is the case will be the hardest thing the government and public sector has to do on 1 January.

Stephen Collins
  • Ric
    Posted at 09:52h, 11 December Reply

    How can we keep the pressure on/motivation up from the outside? Push local members; offer vocal support for Kate Lundy and others like her?

  • Stephen Collins
    Posted at 10:00h, 11 December Reply

    Absolutely all of those, Ric!

    Pressure members, especially Ministers.

    Engage with groups doing great things with public sector info and be a part of the push for more open data.

    Support the politicians and public servants like Kate and Craig Thomler who offer a progressive voice and understand the complexities.

  • Craig Thomler
    Posted at 10:35h, 11 December Reply

    Hi Steve,

    I agree with the need to ‘maintain the rage’.

    Speaking with a couple of the Taskforce members at the Realising our Broadband Future Conference, they also recognise this challenge.

    Maybe we need a wiki to share ideas for how to do this and organising appropriate activities in 2010.

    We can feed in interested parties from the Gov2.0Australia group, #bbfuture followers on Twitter, OzLoopers and the other communities forming in support of Gov 2.0…..

    Shall we set it up?



  • Stephen Collins
    Posted at 10:38h, 11 December Reply

    Craig, absolutely! Let’s be a part of making it happen.

  • Peter Timmins
    Posted at 11:21h, 11 December Reply

    You are right about the potential for slippage. Look for example at how FOI Reform described for the first 18 months or so of the Rudd Government as a “high priority” saw the legislation hit the table(and stay there until next year) on the last scheduled day of sittings.

    The Task Force of course was asked to report by the end of the year because at the time the Information Commissioner to be created by this legislation, was to start from 1 January 2010. That’s now months away. Hence the “black hole “opening up.

    I intend making some comments on the Draft. It strangely gives no attention(other than the importance of cultural change) to the close to 30 years experience of open government through FOI, to other environmental factors such as the 500 secrecy provisions in Federal laws which have a chilling effect on those who work in government, or to the disjunction between open government and the anecdotal evidence of tight and strongly exercised control at the top on information flows to the outside world.

    The Draft also offers no observations other than welcoming noises about the FOI Reform Bill-when its proactive disclosure requirements are very ordinary,and its still using horse and buggy 1980s language like documents(rather than information) when describing rights and obligations. There are other weaknesses as well.

    I have been a very interested spectator of the Task Force work, having been on about these issues for years. For some reason there has been little cross-over or connection between those now pushing for change(often from a technical perspective) and the FOI community( political science, governance, the law, media, academics, civil liberties) who have been pushing reform for a decade or more. Or bringing other heavy hitters like business into the fray.There needs to be some way found to reach across the divide and keep pushing hard on these related issues.

  • Peter Timmins
    Posted at 11:40h, 11 December Reply

    If you haven’t seen it my blog has plenty about FOI reform and related issues.

  • Paul Roberts
    Posted at 15:50h, 11 December Reply

    I share your enthusiasm for the draft report and your concern about the potential for the momentum to go of the rails.

    However, the extraordinary social and economic changes going on through the social web will continue, because these are not matter of technology. It’s all about the people. It’s in the value people get from innovation, expression, collaboration and connection. These are deeply seated drivers of human behaviour and they will go on. I can see that here in the calls for continued action from Craig and Stephen.

    The larger risk is for government as an institution and for its ongoing relevancy as a part of the networked society. I do wonder though, how many in government realise the nature of the risk, and are willing to grasp the opportunities that are available now and into the future.

Post A Comment